According to philosophy

According to philosophy

 In the belief of Indian theistic philosophy, the word has a self-similar relation to its meaning due to its regularity.  On understanding the word in the Veda on a regular basis, Veda has been considered as Apaurusheya (Ishvarapranit).  Nirukatakas also render this.  Theistic philosophy has recognized the word as the best proof.  In this subject, the philosophy of philosophy, philosophy and justice are different.  Vedic apurasheya, continual and automatic evidence are in the opinion of Jaminian Mimansak, Kumaril Adi Mimansak, modern Mimansak and Sankhyakists.  Mimansak considers Veda to be self-fulfilling.  He says that the creation of Vedas is not about any individual or God.  The Naiyayik think that the Vedas are divine.  Mimansak says that the creation of a Vedas-like great Grantharatna by human beings is not possible due to faults, delusions, mischief, misconception etc.  Therefore, Vedas are unconquerable.  Going beyond this, the Naiyayikas propose that God created the Vedas in the same way he created;  It is only reasonable to believe this.
 According to Shruti, the Veda is the breath of the great spirits (yasya nirvatisam veda…).  Breathing problems occur automatically, so they do not require human effort or intelligence.  The Vedas, the breathless form of that mahaabhutta, appears unabashedly themselves.
 The Veda is perpetual by being a codification of the word-word and not productable in any way;  Therefore, the self-invented Vedas prove to be Apoorusheya (God-propelled) by not being composed by any man.  All these ideas have been called aporasheyavad in philosophy.
 Non-Vedic philosophy is also called atheist philosophy, because it does not accept Veda as evidence, it does not accept apurusheya.  He says that Ihloka (jagat) is the playground of the soul, there is no object named Parlok (heaven), 'Kama avaak: Purushartha': - Kama is the only effort of human life, 'Maramamevapavarga:' - Death  (Death) is considered to be moksha (liberation), 'pratyameva proof' - that which is visible is the same proof (conjecture is not proof).  There is no religion, so there is no unrighteousness;  Heaven and hell are not.  'Neither Parmeshwaropi kashnika' - God - there is no one like it, 'neither Dharma: nor Moksha:' - There is neither religion nor salvation.  So, as long as there is life in the body, one gets happiness - in this subject, the atheist Charvak - philosophy clearly says -

 Yavajji and Sukhan Jeevadhran Kritva Ghritam Pibet.

 Bhasmibhutasya dehasya puranagamanam kut:

 'Charva' in the word Charvaka-darshan means food.  This philosophy, which gave the message of 'eating and drinking and having fun' from this 'churv' post, is named 'Charvak-darshan'.  'Gunaratna' has interpreted it in this way - God, Vedas, virtue-sins, heaven-hell, soul, liberation, etc., who have made 'Charvana' (Namesha), is 'Charvaka-darshan'.  The aim of the people of this opinion is that they are more 'heterodox' than self-reliance rather than self-establishment.  They do not believe in Vedpramanya.

 1. The world,
 2. Life,
 3. God and
 4. Moksha- These are the four major representational subjects of all philosophies.

 Acharya Shri Haribhadra in his book named 'Conspiracy-set'

 1. Justice
 2. Special,
 3.Summary,
 4. Yoga,
 5. Physics and
 6. Vedanta - These six are Vedic philosophy (theistic philosophy) and
 7.Charwak,
 8. Buddhist and
 9.Jain-in three have been called 'Avaidic Darshan' (Atheist-Darshan) and have given detailed views on all of them.  The believers who believe in Veda as proof and non-believer are atheists, from this point of view, the above-mentioned Vaishyasikadi conspiracy has been called the believer and Charvakadi philosophy is an atheist.